Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Hanko v. Reitbach
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Hanko v. Reitbach
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Aaron v. Diekstücken and Dam Gora v. Reitbach
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.879%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)62
    Ancestor Loss0
    Ancestor Loss in %100.00 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Gora v. Reitbach50.00011
    Aaron v. Diekstücken50.00011
    Arras v. Eschbach25.00011
    Pascha v. Elbufer25.00011
    Rika v. Linduri25.00011
    Athena v. Hasselrath25.00011
    Gina v. Roonstein12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Arras v. Eikenloh12.50011
    Breeze v. Stockey12.50011
    Maja v. Elbufer12.50011
    Aaron Van't Watermoor12.50011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund12.50011
    Esko v. Huntetal12.50011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch6.25011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp6.25011
    Dixi v. Elbufer6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Derry v. Erlesberg6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel6.25011
    Cora v. Herrenmoor6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Lucie Nelha6.25011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Hektor v. Geierling6.25011
    Freya v. Roonstein6.25011
    Arras v. Autal6.25011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Groll v. Elbufer3.12011
    Jenny v. Huckberg3.12011
    Rena v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Dina Chamavia3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Groll Holsatia3.12011
    Gustel v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Locke Frankundfrei3.12011
    Dandy v. Roonstein3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Jonas Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Gina Ut Dat Uhlendörp3.12011
    Jule v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Dirk v. Geierling3.12011
    Bob v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Alo v. Burgstall3.12011
    Biene v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cindy v. Tenntal3.12011
    Ester v. Geierling3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Faro v. d. Falkenweiden3.12011
    Alf v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s