Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Edward v. Huntetal
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Edward v. Huntetal
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Bathys v. Heidmoor and Dam Valeska v. Huntetal
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Valeska v. Huntetal50.00011
    Bathys v. Heidmoor50.00011
    Vicky v. d. Holzheide25.00011
    Rike v. d. Drachheide25.00011
    Arras v. Eschbach25.00011
    Perro Nelha25.00011
    Solojäger's Granne15.620211
    Anuschka v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Gina v. Roonstein12.50011
    Arras v. Eikenloh12.50011
    Henk v. Huntetal12.50011
    Perle v. d. Holzheide12.50011
    Mirko v. Jurawald12.50011
    Solojäger's Distel6.25011
    Gwenda v. Jurawald6.25011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Becas v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Nixe v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Freya v. Roonstein6.25011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Lucie Nelha6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp6.25011
    Yalk De Wynen6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Fara v. Friedleinsgrund3.12011
    Rachel De Wynen3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Cita v. Winterberg3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Bob v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Dux v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Daisy v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Jenny v. Huckberg3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Edda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Alo v. Burgstall3.12011
    Biene v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Niklas De Wynen3.12011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Hesto v. Werlacke3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Enno v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Cora v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Dandy v. Roonstein3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s