Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Bella v. Holstenhof
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Bella v. Holstenhof
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Dachs v. Dornenkamp and Dam Amber v. Holstenhof
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.879%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.807%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Dachs v. Dornenkamp50.00011
    Amber v. Holstenhof50.00011
    Mirco v. Linduri25.00011
    Cleopatra v. Dornenkamp25.00011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Anna v. Friedrichshof25.00011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Nimrods Enno12.50011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide12.50011
    Blanka v. Brückhof12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Manja v. d. Holzheide12.50011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund12.50011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch6.25011
    Cliff v. Linduri6.25011
    Baron v. Wietensholt6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Irrwisch De Wynen6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Derry v. Erlesberg6.25011
    Corda v. Schatzrain6.25011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Hummel v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Esko v. Huntetal6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.24022
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Dachs v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Cera v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Locke Frankundfrei3.12011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Alka v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Gustel v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Harro v. Lossetal3.12011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Faro v. d. Falkenweiden3.12011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s