Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Cas v. Linduri
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Cas v. Linduri
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Anton to Kathen and Dam Dunja v. Reitbach
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Anton to Kathen50.00011
    Dunja v. Reitbach50.00011
    Rika v. Linduri25.00011
    Preußen's Blitz25.00011
    Arras v. Eikenloh25.00011
    Ilka v. Alten Hafen25.00011
    Pascha v. Elbufer12.50011
    Lucie Nelha12.50011
    Fee v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund12.50011
    Arco v. Backemeer12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Inka v. Rehhörn12.50011
    Lukas v. Linduri12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp9.36033
    Solojäger's Granne6.25011
    Derry v. Erlesberg6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Fonzia v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Maja v. Elbufer6.25011
    Esko v. Huntetal6.25011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch6.25011
    Anke v. Keenmoor6.25011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Dandy v. Roonstein6.25011
    Hatz v. Rehörn6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel6.24022
    Dina v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Anka v. Birkenhaus3.12011
    Dixi v. Elbufer3.12011
    Becas v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Locke Frankundfrei3.12011
    Eika v. Elbufer3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Gustel v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Eiko v. Weithof3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Faro v. d. Falkenweiden3.12011
    Onko v. Tecklenburg3.12011
    Enno Holsatia3.12011
    Gusti v. Giesenbusch3.12011
    Bine v. Sünnekenbusch3.12011
    Cent v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Vella v. Fährhaus3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s