Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Gundel v. Hedelsberg
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Gundel v. Hedelsberg
    COI 5 gen: 1.758%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Westfalen's Cuno and Dam Sichel v. Sämmenhof
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)78
    Ancestor Loss-16
    Ancestor Loss in %125.81 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Aya50.00011
    Sichel v. Sämmenhof50.00011
    Westfalen's Cuno50.00011
    Viggo Fan'E Swadde50.00011
    Ivo v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Dar Z Orlova Cs25.00011
    Aida25.00011
    Kira v. Tillplatz25.00011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Fuda Fan'E Swadde25.00011
    Assendrups Ajax25.00011
    Aloe v.d. Schorlemer'schen Rentei25.00011
    Ajax v. Störenhaus18.750211
    Bautz v. d. Leda15.620211
    Graf v. Silbersee12.50022
    Dana v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Arco v. Backemeer12.50011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Mara Fan'E Swadde12.50011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Andros12.50011
    Lilli v. Buchheim12.50011
    Akita12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Solojäger's Laura12.50011
    Cita12.50011
    Kardommel v. d. Soester Bergen12.50011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof12.490312
    Alf v. Kleindarkehmen6.25011
    Centa6.25011
    Ikarus v. Buchheim6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Distel v. Buchheim6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Wammes X6.25011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten6.25011
    King v. Fährhaus6.25011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Bella-Flora v.d. Mahejohoeve6.25011
    Anke v. Keenmoor6.25011
    Graf Nelha6.25011
    Aron6.25011
    Bella v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Bessi6.25011
    Stasi De Wynen6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Heido v. Wiken6.25011
    Olle v. Fährhaus6.25011
    Solojäger's Harras6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Godalinde v. d Soester Bergen6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.24022
    Dolly v. Lossetal6.24022
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.24022
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Andra v. Buchheim3.12011
    Ara v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Anka v. Birkenhaus3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Antje v. Buchheim3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dina v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Boss Holsatia3.12011
    Cent v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s