Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Uglemosen's Cati
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Uglemosen's Cati
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Groll v. Elbufer and Dam Stasi De Wynen
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 2.930%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Groll v. Elbufer50.00011
    Stasi De Wynen50.00011
    Jenny De Wynen25.00011
    Kreon De Wynen25.00011
    Dixi v. Elbufer25.00011
    Cent v. Hofried25.00011
    Kuno v. Grünbachtal12.50011
    Hazel De Wynen12.50011
    Rena v. d. Binnenelbe12.50011
    Groll Holsatia12.50011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Asta v. Hofried12.50011
    Boro v. Silbersee12.50011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand9.370211
    Bandit v. Grünbachtal6.25011
    Fanny De Wynen6.25011
    Mary v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Astor v. Rothen Hahn6.25011
    Natter v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Dina v. Steinroden6.25011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst6.25011
    Citta v. Langen Siek6.25011
    Ajax v. Klockhof6.25011
    Donna v. Schäftlarn6.25011
    Nina v. d. Binnenelbe6.25011
    Gero v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Dolf v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Heike v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Assi v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Erko v. Dwerger Sand3.12011
    Hannibal v. Haberland3.12011
    Lady De Wynen3.12011
    Donar v. Alten Zollhaus3.12011
    Bessi v. Schäftlarn3.12011
    Zent v. Feuersang3.12011
    Alf v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Arno v. Karlshof3.12011
    Ilka v. Buchenberg3.12011
    Okko Fortuna3.12011
    Bob v. d. Falloh3.12011
    Baron v. Rehsprung3.12011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Alf v. d. Strohee3.12011
    Assi v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Anka v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Greif v. Felsenkeller3.12011
    Certa v. d. Frankenburg3.12011
    Diva v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Eike v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Catja v. Wasserschloss3.12011
    Fenna v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Fina v. Kuhlenbruch3.12011
    Etzel v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Tasso v. Feuersang3.12011
    Assi v. Grabengrund3.12011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Gina Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Tim v. Feuersang3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s