Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Anka v. Schönrain
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Anka v. Schönrain
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Bodo v. d. Kummel and Dam Dixie v. Falkenhorst
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 2.148%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst50.00011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel50.00011
    Graf v. Silbersee25.00011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe25.00011
    Asta v. Mönchsbrunnen25.00011
    Cindy v. Tenntal25.00011
    Gero v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Dolly v. Lossetal12.50011
    Condor v. d. Jägerhalle12.50011
    Bill v. Bessingslust12.50011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe12.50011
    Anka v. d. Zirkelquelle12.50011
    Nora v. d. Bärenburg12.50011
    Boss v. Silbersee12.50011
    Drauf v. d. Lindenhöhe9.370211
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst6.25011
    Hella v. d. Moorbrücke6.25011
    Citta v. Arlsberg6.25011
    Bill v. Straufhain6.25011
    Etzel v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Asko v. Nordpark6.25011
    Astor v. Fichtenhain6.25011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Ilka v. Buchenberg6.25011
    Cessie v. Holundereck6.25011
    Dralle v. Waldesgryn6.25011
    Britta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Konny v. d. Rosenburg6.25011
    Citta v. Langen Siek6.25011
    Grille v. d. Bärenburg6.25011
    Fenna v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Alf v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Harpa v. Feuersang3.12011
    Anka v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cuno v. Horsetal3.12011
    Arko v. Fischerwinkel3.12011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Axel v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Asta v. d. Moorbrücke3.12011
    Dingo v. Spitzberg3.12011
    Daisy v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Arno v. Karlshof3.12011
    Lux v. Fleestedt3.12011
    Dukka v. Spitzberg3.12011
    Cora v. Waldsteinberg3.12011
    Alpha v. Waldfrieden3.12011
    Ulla Frankundfrei3.12011
    Amsel v. Windenhof3.12011
    Alan Z Serikoveho Kraje3.12011
    Aris Soprec3.12011
    Falk v. Waldsteinberg3.12011
    Asti v. Windenhof3.12011
    Astra v. Klosterberg3.12011
    York Frankundfrei3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s