Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Aris v. Osteland
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Aris v. Osteland
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Ferro v. Odisheim and Dam Branka v. Soestental
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 2.344%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Branka v. Soestental50.00011
    Ferro v. Odisheim50.00011
    Hanno v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Carlotta v. Odisheim25.00011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Jule v. Nörderkamp25.00011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp15.620321
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Gera v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Carlo v. Eulenhof12.50011
    Cora v. Linebrok12.50011
    Lukas v. Linduri12.50011
    Tessi v. Odisheim12.50011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Quecke v. Haberland6.25011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck6.25011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Clerens v. Riedhauser Wald6.25011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Erda v. Ruthenstrom6.25011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen6.24022
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.24022
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Lukas De Wynen3.12011
    Biene v. Werhholz3.12011
    Mona v. Haberland3.12011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011
    Cita v. Winterberg3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Orlo v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Alin v. Ruthenstrom3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Drossel v. Hofried3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s