Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Finja v. Luerwald
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Finja v. Luerwald
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Rembrand v. Buchheim and Dam Dayla v. Luerwald
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)67
    Ancestor Loss-5
    Ancestor Loss in %108.06 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Arthus v. Kandelwald50.00011
    Finni v. Deutschen Orden50.00011
    Rembrand v. Buchheim50.00011
    Dayla v. Luerwald50.00011
    Asmus v. d. Segeberger Heide25.00011
    Aiko v. Aischtal25.00011
    Solojäger's Orkan25.00011
    Anka v. Deutschen Orden25.00011
    Lilli v. Buchheim25.00011
    Cosima v. Luerwald25.00011
    Dora v. Deutschen Orden25.00011
    Dag v. Betzloh25.00011
    Distel v. Buchheim18.750211
    Lord v. Jurawald18.750211
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof18.75033
    Gitta v. Buchheim18.750211
    Pascha v. Elbufer12.50011
    Zappe v. Schlemminer Forst12.50011
    Ikarus v. Buchheim12.50011
    Arras v. Eikenloh12.50011
    Britta v. Distelberg12.50011
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck12.50011
    Artus v. Elztal12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Solojäger's Lisl12.50011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden12.50011
    Aspe v. Betzloh12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Zick v. Sämmenhof9.36033
    Cilli v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung6.25011
    Osca v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Bella v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Gwenda v. Jurawald6.25011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Xorro De Wynen6.25011
    Janka v. Wasserschloss6.25011
    Andra v. Buchheim6.25011
    Maja v. Elbufer6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Lucie Nelha6.25011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg6.25011
    Antje v. Buchheim6.25011
    Assel v. Jürgenstorf6.25011
    Esko v. Huntetal6.25011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Solojäger's Harras6.25011
    Dax Nelha6.25011
    Carla v. Sämmenhof6.24022
    Lara v. Werlacke6.24022
    Kasper Vun'N. Wischhoff6.24022
    Lukas De Wynen3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Pascal De Wynen3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Anja v. Salinenblick3.12011
    Uska v. Schlemminer Forst3.12011
    Orion De Wynen3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s