Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Lutz v. Paradies
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Lutz v. Paradies
    COI 5 gen: 1.855%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Aaron v. Fliethbachtal and Dam Illa v. Paradies_
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 2.441%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Illa v. Paradies_50.00011
    Aaron v. Fliethbachtal50.00011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land25.00011
    Bonny v. Brückhof25.00011
    Dele v. Paradies25.00011
    Dolf v. Mönchsbrunnen25.00011
    Esko v. Huntetal15.620211
    Annett v. Paradies12.50011
    Denver v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide12.50011
    Corda v. Schatzrain12.50011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff12.50011
    Aika v. Buchwald12.50011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp9.370211
    Cliff v. Linduri9.370211
    Graf v. Silbersee9.370211
    Alka v. Erlesberg6.25011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz6.25011
    Aury v. Waidbosch6.25011
    Alo v. Burgstall6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Dele v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Biene v. Siegbogen6.25011
    Nimrod's Birko6.25011
    Cora v. Holmesborn6.25011
    Anja v. Salinenblick3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Britt Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Emo v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg3.12011
    Branka v. d. Bärenklause3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Benno v. d. Haalquelle3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Bob v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Solojäger's Anka3.12011
    Dandy v. Roonstein3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Josi v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Ondra v. Lossetal3.12011
    Catja v. Niddatal3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Hasso v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Flott Frankundfrei3.12011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s