Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Basko v. Föhrenberg
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Basko v. Föhrenberg
    COI 5 gen: 2.148%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Dag v. Betzloh and Dam Cora v. Kirschenberg
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 2.344%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Dag v. Betzloh50.00011
    Cora v. Kirschenberg50.00011
    Pascha v. Elbufer25.00011
    Aspe v. Betzloh25.00011
    Denver v. d. Schmiede25.00011
    Perle v. Buchheim25.00011
    Bautz v. d. Leda18.750211
    Maja v. Elbufer12.50011
    Distel v. Buchheim12.50011
    Esko v. Huntetal12.50011
    Dachs v. Wietensholt12.50011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Cilli v. d. Hasenheide12.50011
    Aury v. Waidbosch12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee9.370211
    Gitta v. Lossetal9.370211
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp9.370211
    Cliff v. Linduri9.370211
    Esko v. Mühlenberg6.25011
    Conny v. Wietensholt6.25011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Emo v. Falkenhorst6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel6.25011
    Ondra v. Lossetal6.25011
    Antje v. Buchheim6.25011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Dixi v. Elbufer6.25011
    Branka v. d. Bärenklause6.25011
    Bob v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Hesto v. Werlacke3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Eike v. Lossetal3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Carla v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Cindy v. Tenntal3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Irrwisch De Wynen3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Fanni v. Osterfeld3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Hasso v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Rena v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Cilly v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Eggi v. Bruckhof3.12011
    Groll Holsatia3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Kasper Vun'N. Wischhoff3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Bosco v. Rotenberg3.12011
    Cera v. Borgkamp3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s