Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Saba v. Kampstüh
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Saba v. Kampstüh
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Aron v. Averbeck and Dam Pia v. Kampstüh
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.879%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Aron v. Averbeck50.00011
    Pia v. Kampstüh50.00011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern25.00011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg25.00011
    Laika v. Kampstüh25.00011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Alice v. Wiebusch12.50011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Beste v. Hegholz12.50011
    Anka v. Schönrain12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee9.370211
    Lara v. Werlacke6.25011
    Cora v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel6.25011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Alba v. Immenhof6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Osca v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Filou v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst6.25011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011
    Asta v. Werlacke3.12011
    Vroni v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Dandy v. Roonstein3.12011
    Gambo v. Werlacke3.12011
    Cindy v. Tenntal3.12011
    Burgl v. Waldhaus3.12011
    Jago v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Asta v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Alf v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Cent v. Hofried3.12011
    Dina Chamavia3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Arko v. Kammerforst3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s