Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Asta v. Schomershof
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Asta v. Schomershof
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Eddy v. Riehenbusch and Dam Nova v. Lönsstein
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.270%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Nova v. Lönsstein50.00011
    Eddy v. Riehenbusch50.00011
    Arco v. Backemeer25.00011
    Heidehexe v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Nostra De Wynen25.00011
    Basko v. Tannengarten25.00011
    Gilla De Wynen12.50011
    Jule v. Linduri12.50011
    Gera v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck12.50011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten12.50011
    Erlo De Wynen12.50011
    Anke v. Keenmoor12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp9.370211
    Cent v. Hasselbach6.25011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg6.25011
    Esko v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Rachel De Wynen6.25011
    Groll v. Huntetal6.25011
    Dina v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Anka v. Birkenhaus6.25011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Immo De Wynen6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Hazel De Wynen6.25011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Orlo v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Cora v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Fanny De Wynen3.12011
    Ass v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Ossy De Wynen3.12011
    Cita v. Winterberg3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Freya v. Steinroden3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Astor v. Rothen Hahn3.12011
    Bob v. Zent-hof3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cai Holsatia3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Troll v. Rheinufer3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s