Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Aik v. Bückeberg
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Aik v. Bückeberg
    COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Emil v. Odisheim and Dam Onja v. Stockey
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.758%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)69
    Ancestor Loss-7
    Ancestor Loss in %111.29 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Onja v. Stockey50.00011
    Bathys v. Heidmoor50.00011
    Pia v. Kampstüh50.00011
    Emil v. Odisheim50.00011
    Arko v. Fliethbachtal25.00011
    Laika v. Kampstüh25.00011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Rike v. d. Drachheide25.00011
    Arras v. Eschbach25.00011
    Carlotta v. Odisheim25.00011
    Juwel v. Perverberg25.00011
    Gusti v. Stockey25.00011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land18.750211
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Beste v. Hegholz12.50011
    Bonny v. Brückhof12.50011
    Gina v. Roonstein12.50011
    Arras v. Eikenloh12.50011
    Tessi v. Odisheim12.50011
    Evita v. Stockey12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Mirko v. Jurawald12.50011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Carlo v. Eulenhof12.50011
    Anuschka v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Alex v. Bannwald12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee9.370211
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp9.370211
    Osca v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp6.25011
    Lucie Nelha6.25011
    Esko v. Huntetal6.25011
    Corda v. Schatzrain6.25011
    Asco Westerode6.25011
    Erda v. Ruthenstrom6.25011
    Alba v. Immenhof6.25011
    Solojäger's Harras6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Branca v. d. Biberquelle6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Freya v. Roonstein6.25011
    Gwenda v. Jurawald6.25011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Afra v. d. Bohlsener Mühle3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Dina Chamavia3.12011
    Becas v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Amber De Wynen3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Alin v. Ruthenstrom3.12011
    Alf v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Cora v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Alka v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s