Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Jana v. d. Trave
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Jana v. d. Trave
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Juwel v. Perverberg and Dam Flocke v. Forst Ostenwalde
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Juwel v. Perverberg50.00011
    Flocke v. Forst Ostenwalde50.00011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz25.00011
    Jako v. Fasanenhof25.00011
    Grille v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide25.00011
    Onko v. Tecklenburg12.50011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide12.50011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide12.50011
    Laura v. Poppenforst12.50011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald12.50011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst9.370211
    Graf v. Silbersee9.370211
    Cliff v. Linduri9.370211
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Dax v. d. Aue6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau6.25011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Farah v. Minatal6.25011
    Anett v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Cita v. Winterberg6.25011
    Elsa v. Burghöft6.25011
    Amsel v. Fredenhof6.25011
    Jerome De Wynen6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Ute v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Edu v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Erle v. Steinroden3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Otti v. Faistenau3.12011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Cora v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Bella v. d. Aue3.12011
    Iva v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Yalk De Wynen3.12011
    Alf v.d. Goldenen Aue3.12011
    Bill v. Bessingslust3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Exy v. Minatal3.12011
    Janka v. Tecklenburg3.12011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Nadja De Wynen3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Niklas De Wynen3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Esso v. Oberleis3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s