Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Judy v. Forst Ostenwalde
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Judy v. Forst Ostenwalde
    COI 5 gen: 1.074%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Osca Aus Grupilinga and Dam Cita v. Forst Ostenwalde
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.270%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.465%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Cita v. Forst Ostenwalde50.00011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga50.00011
    Solojäger's Laura25.00011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Certa v. Hülsebusch25.00011
    Lord v. Jurawald25.00011
    Jerome De Wynen15.620211
    Solojäger's Harras12.50011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung12.50011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Gwenda v. Jurawald12.50011
    Nixe v. d. Holzheide12.50011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Fara v. Friedleinsgrund6.25011
    Daisy v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Nimrod's Birko6.25011
    Dux v. Falkenhorst6.25011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Nadja De Wynen6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Niklas De Wynen6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Yalk De Wynen6.25011
    Solojäger's Distel6.25011
    Jenny De Wynen6.24022
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Irrwisch De Wynen6.24022
    Cessy v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Asta v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Rachel De Wynen3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Alf v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Edda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Britt Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Arko v. Kammerforst3.12011
    Artemis v. d. Wandelburg3.12011
    Hesto v. Werlacke3.12011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Esko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s