Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Baika v. Mesum-Feld
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Baika v. Mesum-Feld
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Gerry v. Paradies and Dam Ida Gettrup
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 3.125%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Gerry v. Paradies50.00011
    Ida Gettrup50.00011
    Dele v. Paradies25.00011
    Basko v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Dolly Nelha25.00011
    Graf Nelha25.00011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp15.620211
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp12.50011
    Annett v. Paradies12.50011
    Birke Nelha12.50011
    Solojäger's Granne12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Quacks v. Lossetal12.50011
    Certa v. Hülsebusch12.50011
    Cliff v. Linduri9.370211
    Eike v. Lossetal6.25011
    Jerome De Wynen6.25011
    Lukas De Wynen6.25011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Solojäger's Distel6.25011
    Dele v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Becas v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Alo v. Burgstall6.25011
    Biene v. Siegbogen6.25011
    Nixe v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Nixe v. Lossetal6.25011
    Nimrod's Birko6.25011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Britta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Josi v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Ajax v. Klockhof3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Edda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011
    Hasso v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Dandy v. Roonstein3.12011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Nadja De Wynen3.12011
    Cita v. Winterberg3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Niklas De Wynen3.12011
    Hazel De Wynen3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Benno v. d. Haalquelle3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Yalk De Wynen3.12011
    Alf v. Waldhaus3.12011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Xaver v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Solojäger's Anka3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s