Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Bautz
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Bautz
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Kahn v. Lossetal and Dam Stasi De Wynen
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 3.027%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Kahn v. Lossetal50.00011
    Stasi De Wynen50.00011
    Jenny De Wynen25.00011
    Kreon De Wynen25.00011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke25.00011
    Natter v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Kuno v. Grünbachtal12.50011
    Cita v. d. Tränke12.50011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand12.50011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren12.50011
    Hazel De Wynen12.50011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Boro v. Silbersee12.50011
    Zent v. Feuersang9.370211
    Dolf v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Citta v. Langen Siek6.25011
    Donna v. Schäftlarn6.25011
    Ysa v. Rudenhay6.25011
    Argo v. Bergwinkel6.25011
    Grandt v. d. Uhrau6.25011
    Fanny De Wynen6.25011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst6.25011
    Bandit v. Grünbachtal6.25011
    Diva v. d. Uhrau6.25011
    Astor v. Rothen Hahn6.25011
    Assi v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Donar v. Alten Zollhaus6.25011
    Freifrau v. d. Overbecker Mühle6.25011
    Mary v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Baron v. Rehsprung6.24022
    Chef v. Clemenswerth3.12011
    Katja Germania3.12011
    Djuka v. Wildenloh Harz3.12011
    Certa v. d. Frankenburg3.12011
    Arno v. Hahnenknoop3.12011
    Arno v. Karlshof3.12011
    Erko v. Dwerger Sand3.12011
    Catja v. Wasserschloss3.12011
    Bona v. Alten Zollhaus3.12011
    Bandit v. Wildenloh-Harz3.12011
    Bessi v. Schäftlarn3.12011
    Hannibal v. Haberland3.12011
    Assi v. Grabengrund3.12011
    Carla Germania3.12011
    Tim v. Feuersang3.12011
    Amos3.12011
    Killer v. Feuersang3.12011
    Bali v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Alf v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Tessa v. Rüdenhay3.12011
    Korda v. Feuersang3.12011
    Anka v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Greif v. Felsenkeller3.12011
    Fee Solms3.12011
    Fenna v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Lady De Wynen3.12011
    Alf v. d. Strohee3.12011
    Fina v. Kuhlenbruch3.12011
    Axel v. Eickebusch3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s