Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Usta Nelha
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Usta Nelha
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Dolf v. Mönchsbrunnen and Dam Rauke Nelha
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Dolf v. Mönchsbrunnen50.00011
    Rauke Nelha50.00011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide25.00011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff25.00011
    Jola Nelha25.00011
    Denver v. d. Schmiede25.00011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Rosa v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Dax Nelha12.50011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald12.50011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff12.50011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Aury v. Waidbosch12.50011
    Nimrod's Birko9.370211
    Birke Nelha6.25011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Esko v. Huntetal6.25011
    Quacks v. Lossetal6.25011
    Farah v. Minatal6.25011
    Ondra v. Lossetal6.25011
    Elsa v. Burghöft6.25011
    Branka v. d. Bärenklause6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Britt Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Emo v. Falkenhorst6.25011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg6.25011
    Eike v. Lossetal6.24022
    Cliff v. Linduri6.24022
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Esta v. Ruthenstrom3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Lukas De Wynen3.12011
    Otti v. Faistenau3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Nixe v. Lossetal3.12011
    Iva v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Hesto v. Werlacke3.12011
    Irrwisch De Wynen3.12011
    Hasso v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Alf v.d. Goldenen Aue3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Cilly v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Eggi v. Bruckhof3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Exy v. Minatal3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bosco v. Rotenberg3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Esso v. Oberleis3.12011
    Fanni v. Osterfeld3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s