Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Don v. Mittelrhein
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Don v. Mittelrhein
    COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Blitz v. Elztal and Dam Rena v. Elbufer
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 2.344%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Rena v. Elbufer50.00011
    Blitz v. Elztal50.00011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz25.00011
    Bella v. Hanauer Land25.00011
    Carlo v. Eulenhof25.00011
    Maja v. Elbufer25.00011
    Lukas De Wynen18.750211
    Dixi v. Elbufer12.50011
    Aika v. Buchwald12.50011
    Anja v. Salinenblick12.50011
    Clerens v. Riedhauser Wald12.50011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel12.50011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche12.50011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck12.50011
    Hazel De Wynen9.370211
    Xaver v. Lönsstein9.370211
    Boss v. Silbersee9.370211
    Uhl v. Lönsstein9.370211
    Hussa v. Rheinufer6.25011
    Groll Holsatia6.25011
    Cora v. Holmesborn6.25011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Cäsar v. d. Zirkelquelle6.25011
    Drossel v. Hofried6.25011
    Cindy v. Tenntal6.25011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Biene v. Werhholz6.25011
    Rena v. d. Binnenelbe6.25011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Gero v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Anka v. d. Vereinigung3.12011
    Bill v. Bessingslust3.12011
    Nora v. d. Bärenburg3.12011
    Dolf v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Hohen Geest3.12011
    Ajax v. Klockhof3.12011
    Hella v. d. Moorbrücke3.12011
    Bianka v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Boro v. Silbersee3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Astor v. Rothen Hahn3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Amsel v. Rothäuser Bruch3.12011
    Mary v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dina v. Steinroden3.12011
    Condor v. d. Jägerhalle3.12011
    Fanny De Wynen3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Asta v. Hofried3.12011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Piter v. Feuersang3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Nina v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Catja v. Niddatal3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s