Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Briska v. Kiebitzholm
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Briska v. Kiebitzholm
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Dachs v. Dornenkamp and Dam Espe v. Lanhusen
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.879%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Espe v. Lanhusen50.00011
    Dachs v. Dornenkamp50.00011
    Mirco v. Linduri25.00011
    Uri v. Bärenhorst25.00011
    Cleopatra v. Dornenkamp25.00011
    Kira Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Manja v. d. Holzheide12.50011
    Carlo v. Eulenhof12.50011
    Nimrods Enno12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund12.50011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek12.50011
    Graf Nelha12.50011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp12.50011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck9.370211
    Irrwisch De Wynen6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Baron v. Wietensholt6.25011
    Clerens v. Riedhauser Wald6.25011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Asra v. Eulenhof6.25011
    Hummel v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Solojäger's Granne6.25011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Gero v. Wiken6.25011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Chico v. Borgkamp6.25011
    Derry v. Erlesberg6.25011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Cera v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Biene v. Werhholz3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Locke Frankundfrei3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Harro v. Lossetal3.12011
    Pascha v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Gustel v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Faro v. d. Falkenweiden3.12011
    Drossel v. Hofried3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Dachs v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Delta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Enno Holsatia3.12011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Maestro De Wynen3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Becas v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Lukas De Wynen3.12011
    Elvi v. Lossetal3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s