Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Asta v. Kochertal
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Asta v. Kochertal
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Harras v. Niddatal and Dam Hella v. d. Holzheide
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 3.125%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)56
    Ancestor Loss6
    Ancestor Loss in %90.32 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Hella v. d. Holzheide50.00011
    Harras v. Niddatal50.00011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff25.00011
    Cäsar v. d. Zirkelquelle25.00011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst25.00011
    Farah v. Niddatal25.00011
    Gero v. Sämmenhof15.620211
    Groll v. Reutherspfad12.50011
    Cent v. Hofried12.50011
    Biene v. Ringofen12.50011
    Unda v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Hella v. d. Moorbrücke12.50011
    Britta v. Niddatal12.50011
    Birko v. Holsatia12.50011
    Cilli v. Berghof6.25011
    Asta v. d. Moorbrücke6.25011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Zent v. Feuersang6.25011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren6.25011
    Dina v. Steinroden6.25011
    Lux v. Fleestedt6.25011
    Etzel v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Asta v. Hofried6.25011
    Gambo v. Werlacke6.25011
    Ilka v. Buchenberg6.25011
    Janka v. Holmesborn6.25011
    Manto v. d. Düsterbeck6.25011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Asta v. Werlacke6.25011
    Asta v. Steinleite6.24022
    Alf v. Schinterkogel3.12011
    Don v. Kipp3.12011
    Grandt v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Axel v. Teufelsloch3.12011
    Cuno v. Horsetal3.12011
    Amsel v. Maistieg3.12011
    Certa v. d. Frankenburg3.12011
    Baron v. Rehsprung3.12011
    Brack v. d. Kautenback3.12011
    Cilli v. Preussenwald3.12011
    Birko v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Gina Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Heike v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Korda v. Feuersang3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Düsterbeck3.12011
    Axel v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bobby v. Leefeld3.12011
    Altje v. d. Uptloher Mark3.12011
    Freifrau v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Daisy v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Chef v. Clemenswerth3.12011
    Harpa v. Feuersang3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Tasso v. Feuersang3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s