Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Calle v. Kleinen Moor
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Calle v. Kleinen Moor
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Dolf v. Mönchsbrunnen and Dam Esther v. Wietensholt
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Esther v. Wietensholt50.00011
    Dolf v. Mönchsbrunnen50.00011
    Orkan v. d. Königseiche25.00011
    Conny v. Wietensholt25.00011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff25.00011
    Denver v. d. Schmiede25.00011
    Aury v. Waidbosch12.50011
    Cliff v. Linduri12.50011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Inka v. d. Königseiche12.50011
    Cera v. Borgkamp12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Alo v. Burgstall12.50011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp9.370211
    Esko v. Huntetal6.25011
    Branka v. d. Bärenklause6.25011
    Solojäger's Anka6.25011
    Ondra v. Lossetal6.25011
    Benno v. d. Haalquelle6.25011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Britt Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Elvi v. Lossetal6.25011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg6.25011
    Bianka v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Emo v. Falkenhorst6.25011
    Erko v. Jahnplatz6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Flocke v. d. Tränke6.24022
    Wido v. Schwege6.24022
    Sonja v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Hesto v. Werlacke3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Edda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Chisko Jenno Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Bosco v. Rotenberg3.12011
    Hasso v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Eggi v. Bruckhof3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Lord v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cilly v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Freya v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Cäsar v. Bruckhof3.12011
    Eike v. Lossetal3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Fanni v. Osterfeld3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Irrwisch De Wynen3.12011
    Esta v. Ruthenstrom3.12011
    Hilda v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s