Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Immo v. Paradies
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Immo v. Paradies
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Dolf v. Mönchsbrunnen and Dam Dele v. Paradies
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Dele v. Paradies50.00011
    Dolf v. Mönchsbrunnen50.00011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff25.00011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp25.00011
    Annett v. Paradies25.00011
    Denver v. d. Schmiede25.00011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Dele v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Alo v. Burgstall12.50011
    Biene v. Siegbogen12.50011
    Nimrod's Birko12.50011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff12.50011
    Aury v. Waidbosch12.50011
    Solojäger's Anka6.25011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Dandy v. Roonstein6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Esko v. Huntetal6.25011
    Josi v. Königsfeld6.25011
    Ondra v. Lossetal6.25011
    Benno v. d. Haalquelle6.25011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Hasso v. Langen Siek6.25011
    Cliff v. Linduri6.25011
    Britt Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Branka v. d. Bärenklause6.25011
    Emo v. Falkenhorst6.25011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg6.25011
    Chico v. Borgkamp6.24022
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.24022
    Hesto v. Werlacke3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Hilda v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Edda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Bosco v. Rotenberg3.12011
    Hasso v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Lord v. Reinufer3.12011
    Yra v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Cilly v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Bine v. Sünnekenbusch3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Cäsar v. Bruckhof3.12011
    Esta v. Ruthenstrom3.12011
    Eggi v. Bruckhof3.12011
    Dunja v. d. Krausen Eiche3.12011
    Eike v. Lossetal3.12011
    Fanni v. Osterfeld3.12011
    Irrwisch De Wynen3.12011
    Vella v. Fährhaus3.12011
    Dux v. Silbersee3.12011
    Eiko v. Weithof3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Harro v. Lossetal3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s