Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Goswin De Wynen
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Goswin De Wynen
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Esko v. Bärenhorst and Dam Rachel De Wynen
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)65
    Ancestor Loss-3
    Ancestor Loss in %104.84 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Esko v. Bärenhorst50.00011
    Rachel De Wynen50.00011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof25.00011
    Cai Holsatia25.00011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Unda v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Bob v. Zent-hof25.00011
    Anka v. Schönrain25.00011
    Asta v. Werlacke18.750211
    Gambo v. Werlacke18.750211
    Hanko v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Dolf v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst12.50011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Jette v. d. Bilsbek12.50011
    Lara v. Werlacke12.50011
    Mary v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel12.50011
    Asta v. Steinleite12.490312
    Alf v. Schinterkogel9.370211
    Cent v. Hofried6.25011
    Baron v. Rehsprung6.25011
    Fina v. Kuhlenbruch6.25011
    Asta v. Mönchsbrunnen6.25011
    Immo v. d. Binnenelbe6.25011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Okko Fortuna6.25011
    Vroni v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Alf v. d. Strohee6.25011
    Eike v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Cindy v. Tenntal6.25011
    Alfa v. d. Mollwiese6.25011
    Certa v. d. Frankenburg6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Axel v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bill v. Bessingslust3.12011
    Nora v. d. Bärenburg3.12011
    Argo vom Eichental(gen Bär)3.12011
    Dolli vom Reuth3.12011
    Dax v. Horsetal3.12011
    Hella v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Fasko v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Juno Fortuna3.12011
    Anka v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Atempo v. d. Eggemerigge3.12011
    Cäsar v. d Holzheide3.12011
    Asta v. d. Frankenburg3.12011
    Eiko v. Feuersang3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Eike v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Condor v. d. Jägerhalle3.12011
    Daisy v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Hecht v. Schlemminer Forst3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Bobby v. Leefeld3.12011
    Dolly v. Konigsthal3.12011
    Cita Germania3.12011
    Assi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Gero v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Asta v. Hofried3.12011
    Flott v. Feuersang3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s