Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Biene v. Meyerhof
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Biene v. Meyerhof
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hasko v. Linebrok and Dam Birke v. Loher Schwarten
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 6.250%    low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Hasko v. Linebrok50.00011
    Birke v. Loher Schwarten50.00011
    Henry v. Forstgarten25.00011
    Lona v. Linduri25.00011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck25.00011
    Elfe v. Linebrok25.00011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp21.8703111
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck12.50011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Hesta v. Linduri12.50011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg12.50011
    Dina v. Forstgarten12.50011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen9.370211
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg9.370211
    Orlo v. d. Overbecker Mühle6.25011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Cora v. Linebrok6.25011
    Troll v. Rheinufer6.25011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Ossy De Wynen6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Freya v. Steinroden6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Groll v. Huntetal6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.24022
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Boss Holsatia3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Tim v. Feuersang3.12011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Alard v. d. Leda3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Quecke v. Haberland3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Arko v. Abtswald3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Ajax v. Klockhof3.12011
    Gilla v. Reinufer3.12011
    Alf v. Geierling3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Jenka v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Itta De Wynen3.12011
    Gina Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Rig Chamavia3.12011
    Anja v. Salinenblick3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s