Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Dino v. Talsperre
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Dino v. Talsperre
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Eddy v. Riehenbusch and Dam Mirka v. Linduri
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Mirka v. Linduri50.00011
    Eddy v. Riehenbusch50.00011
    Arco v. Backemeer25.00011
    Bautz v. d. Leda25.00011
    Nostra De Wynen25.00011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund25.00011
    Graf v. Silbersee12.50011
    Erlo De Wynen12.50011
    Gitta v. Lossetal12.50011
    Derry v. Erlesberg12.50011
    Gilla De Wynen12.50011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten12.50011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch12.50011
    Anke v. Keenmoor12.50011
    Locke Frankundfrei6.25011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Esko v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Hazel De Wynen6.25011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke6.25011
    Dina v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Anka v. Birkenhaus6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.25011
    Immo De Wynen6.25011
    Dolly v. Lossetal6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Gustel v. d. Kiefhornsmühle6.25011
    Faro v. d. Falkenweiden6.25011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Cent v. Hasselbach6.25011
    Rachel De Wynen6.25011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cai Holsatia3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Bill v. Bessingslust3.12011
    Orlo v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Cindy v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Ass v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Cilli v. Grünen Wege3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Dona v. Jägerhalle3.12011
    Fanny De Wynen3.12011
    Cita v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Astor v. Rothen Hahn3.12011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Britta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Berry v. Nordpark3.12011
    Freya v. Steinroden3.12011
    Gero Frankundfrei3.12011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bob v. Zent-hof3.12011
    Cora v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s