Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Zeus ll v. Buchheim
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Zeus ll v. Buchheim
    COI 5 gen: 3.125%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Timmi v. Buchheim and Dam Schoko v. Buchheim
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Schoko v. Buchheim50.00011
    Timmi v. Buchheim50.00011
    Egon v. Buchheim31.250211
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen25.00011
    Orvett v. Buchheim25.00011
    Basko v. Aartal25.00011
    Westfalen's Chef15.620211
    Rivkah v. Buchheim15.620211
    Basca v. Mühbrooker Meer12.50011
    Locke v. Buchheim12.50011
    Axel v. Murner See12.50011
    Basko v. Tannengarten12.50011
    Anja v. Veybach12.50011
    Faust v. d. Mainauen12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach9.370211
    Asmus v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Erle v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Jule v. Linduri6.25011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Lilli v. Buchheim6.25011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Bara v.d. Mainauen6.25011
    Grandl De Wynen6.25011
    Milla v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Horneth v. Buchheim6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese3.12011
    Debby v. Emsdeich3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Distel v. Buchheim3.12011
    Heidehexe v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Distel v.d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Conrad v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Pascha v. Elbufer3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Ikarus v. Buchheim3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Centa v. Kirschenberg3.12011
    Caesar v. Holdergrund3.12011
    Unken v. Buchheim3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Xanthippe De Wynen3.12011
    Achill v.d. Krakequelle3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s