Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Dexter v. Lotten
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Dexter v. Lotten
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Caruso v. d. Hutteneiche and Dam Dolly v. Großen Herzberg
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Dolly v. Großen Herzberg50.00011
    Caruso v. d. Hutteneiche50.00011
    Bento Bavaria25.00011
    Alice v. Großen Herzberg25.00011
    Anton v. d. Klosterwiese25.00011
    Gitti v. Veybach25.00011
    Arras v. Eschbach15.620211
    Jesko v. Heek12.50011
    Westfalen's Artus12.50011
    Cleo v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Boss v. Mellin12.50011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide12.50011
    Izzy v. Buchheim12.50011
    Gina L v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz9.370211
    Cora v. Heek6.25011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Elsbeth v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Westfalen's Chef6.25011
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Pom v. Minatal6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Hardy v. Paradies6.25011
    Basco v. Matzental6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Ondra v. Stockey6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Arko v. Fliethbachtal3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Samson v. Linduri3.12011
    Kora v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Isko v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Anja v. Veybach3.12011
    Elko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Orka v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Gusti v. Stockey3.12011
    Asta v. Pamesgrub3.12011
    Baco v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Basko v. Tannengarten3.12011
    Nora v. Minatal3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Dele v. Paradies3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Aika v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Anka v. Heek3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s