Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Brando ll v. d. Riedleite
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Brando ll v. d. Riedleite
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Avanti v. d. Frankenhöhe and Dam Vroni v.d. Riedleide
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Avanti v. d. Frankenhöhe50.00011
    Vroni v.d. Riedleide50.00011
    Egon v. Buchheim25.00011
    Iska v. Erlengrund25.00011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher25.00011
    Iris v. d. Riedleite25.00011
    Farah v. Kappelbuck12.50011
    Westfalen's Chef12.50011
    Rivkah v. Buchheim12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50022
    Aron v. Averbeck12.50011
    Akim v. Rothsee12.50011
    Jana v. d. Riedleite12.50011
    Westfalen's Birka12.50011
    Harras v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Arthus v. Kandelwald6.25011
    Quelle v. Buchheim6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Elch v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Asmus v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Foko v. Erlengrund6.25011
    Lilli v. Buchheim6.25011
    Gauner v. Stockey6.25011
    Bonie v. Keltenquell6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.24022
    Distel v. Buchheim6.24022
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.24022
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.24022
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Ikarus v. Buchheim3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Alex v. Bannwald3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Aiko v. Aischtal3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Aika v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Karlo v. Linebrok3.12011
    Mona v. Linduri3.12011
    Anka v. Deutschen Orden3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Dachs v. Wietensholt3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Igor v. Perverberg3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden3.12011
    Fabo v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Evita v. Stockey3.12011
    Bonie v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s