Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Anni v. Schlossgut
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Anni v. Schlossgut
    COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Bruno v. Seumepark and Dam Hilde v. Rehbrunn
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Hilde v. Rehbrunn50.00011
    Bruno v. Seumepark50.00011
    Xara v. Kampstüh25.00011
    Gero v. Alt-Hümmling25.00011
    Nemo v. Schatzrain25.00011
    Gitta v. Heek25.00011
    Anka v. Heek12.50011
    Dag v. Betzloh12.50011
    Westfalen's Cuno12.50011
    Kuno v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Caj v. Alt-Hümmling12.50011
    Maja v. Schatzrain12.50011
    Cita v. Hollbäck12.50011
    Vina v. Kampstüh12.50011
    Asta v. Averbeck9.370211
    Igor v. Linebrok9.370211
    Aspe v. Betzloh6.25011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher6.25011
    Aischa v. Heek6.25011
    Pascha v. Elbufer6.25011
    Dean v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Aska v. Forstkamp6.25011
    Bathys v. Heidmoor6.25011
    Anton v. Keltenquell6.25011
    Helge v. Schatzrain6.25011
    Pia v. Kampstüh6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.24022
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Moni v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Bea v. d.Manningaburg3.12011
    Esko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Rike v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Artus v. Elztal3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Cilli v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Solojäger's Monarch3.12011
    Aron v. Averbeck3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Maja v. Elbufer3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Bonie v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer3.12011
    Laika v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Dina v. Schatzrain3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Westfalen's Birka3.12011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s