Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Gero v. d. Frankenhöhe
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Gero v. d. Frankenhöhe
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Ignatz v. Deutschen Orden and Dam Adelheid v. d. Frankenhöhe
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Ignatz v. Deutschen Orden50.00011
    Adelheid v. d. Frankenhöhe50.00011
    Karlo v. d. Jade25.00011
    Egon v. Buchheim25.00011
    Iska v. Erlengrund25.00011
    Grete v. Deutschen Orden25.00011
    Akim v. Rothsee12.50011
    Jana v. d. Riedleite12.50011
    Antje v. Horum12.50011
    Gero v. Reitbach12.50011
    Westfalen's Chef12.50011
    Rivkah v. Buchheim12.50011
    Arthus v. Kandelwald12.50011
    Finni v. Deutschen Orden12.50011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Anka v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Cody v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Foko v. Erlengrund6.25011
    Dora v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Asmus v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Bea v. Calveslage6.25011
    Bonie v. Keltenquell6.25011
    Dag v. Betzloh6.25011
    Lilli v. Buchheim6.25011
    Aiko v. Aischtal6.25011
    Elch v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Karlo v. Linebrok6.24022
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden6.24022
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Lord v. Jurawald3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Ikarus v. Buchheim3.12011
    Aika v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Igor v. Perverberg3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Distel v. Buchheim3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Fabo v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Cora v. Bonrechtern3.12011
    Bonie v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Aspe v. Betzloh3.12011
    Gitta v. Buchheim3.12011
    Hasko v. Linebrok3.12011
    Mona v. Linduri3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Pascha v. Elbufer3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Britta v. Distelberg3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s