Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Ajuga v. Witten Sand
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Ajuga v. Witten Sand
    COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Avanti v. d. Frankenhöhe and Dam Hella v. d. Wallburg
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Avanti v. d. Frankenhöhe50.00011
    Hella v. d. Wallburg50.00011
    Hektor v. Emsdeich25.00011
    Vroni v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Egon v. Buchheim25.00011
    Iska v. Erlengrund25.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Debby v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Rivkah v. Buchheim12.50011
    Westfalen's Chef12.50011
    Akim v. Rothsee12.50011
    Jana v. d. Riedleite12.50011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz9.370211
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Westfalen's Artus6.25011
    Bonie v. Keltenquell6.25011
    Asmus v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Quell v. Huntetal6.25011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld6.25011
    Elch v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Lilli v. Buchheim6.25011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Foko v. Erlengrund6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.24022
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.24022
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.24022
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Karlo v. Linebrok3.12011
    Mona v. Linduri3.12011
    Fabo v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Dolly Nelha3.12011
    Maika v. Wiken3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Distel v. Buchheim3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Henk v. Huntetal3.12011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Bonie v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Igor v. Perverberg3.12011
    Nimrods Enno3.12011
    Ikarus v. Buchheim3.12011
    Aika v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s