Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Dora v. Bökenberg
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Dora v. Bökenberg
    COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Bolle v.d. Reutereiche and Dam Vreni v. Bonrechtern
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)74
    Ancestor Loss-12
    Ancestor Loss in %119.35 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Elch v. Hanauer Land50.00011
    Laura v. Poppenforst50.00011
    Vreni v. Bonrechtern50.00011
    Bolle v.d. Reutereiche50.00011
    Aika v. Buchwald25.00011
    Hektor v. Emsdeich25.00011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide25.00011
    Jerome De Wynen25.00011
    Dixi v. Haltergrund25.00011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide25.00011
    Andra v.d. Reutereiche25.00011
    Asko v. d. Berkelaue25.00011
    Nadja De Wynen12.50011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Niklas De Wynen12.50011
    Vasko v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Irrwisch De Wynen12.50022
    Pina v. Bonrechtern12.50011
    Jenny De Wynen12.50022
    Kuno v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Cora v. Holmesborn12.50011
    Samson v. Linduri12.50011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Yalk De Wynen12.50011
    Ira v. Stockey12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee12.50011
    Cliff v. Linduri12.50011
    Isabell v. Buchheim12.50011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel9.370211
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp9.370211
    Groll v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Aika v. Lewitzgrund6.25011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Dark v. d. Himmerner Heide6.25011
    Dolly v. Lossetal6.25011
    Hesto v. Werlacke6.25011
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Unda v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Rachel De Wynen6.25011
    Gusti v. Stockey6.25011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Utz v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.25011
    Dean v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
    Catja v. Niddatal6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Herman v. Schatzrain6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Preußen's Blitz3.12011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Ilka v. Bonrechtern3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Moni v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Bea v. d.Manningaburg3.12011
    Artus v. Elztal3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Westfalen's Artus3.12011
    Alex v. Bannwald3.12011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Dina v. Schatzrain3.12011
    Evita v. Stockey3.12011
    Basko v. Tannengarten3.12011
    Anja v. Veybach3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s