Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Venus v. Schatzrain
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Venus v. Schatzrain
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Fritz v. Kiekenbruch and Dam Okka v. Schatzrain
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Fritz v. Kiekenbruch50.00011
    Okka v. Schatzrain50.00011
    Solojäger's Unkas25.00011
    Chef v. Seulingswald25.00011
    Clara v. Kiekenbruch25.00011
    Mona v. Schatzrain25.00011
    Ibse v. Linebrok12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Solojäger's Maraun12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Helge v. Schatzrain12.50011
    Gauner v. Stockey12.50011
    Anton v. Keltenquell12.50011
    Yda v. d. Binnenelbe12.50011
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck9.370211
    Jola Nelha9.370211
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg6.25011
    Gabi v.d. Röthaller6.25011
    Alex v. Bannwald6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Solojäger's Monarch6.25011
    Elfe v. Linebrok6.25011
    Artus v. Elztal6.25011
    Evita v. Stockey6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Bonie v. Birkengehege6.25011
    Dina v. Schatzrain6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Solojäger's Harras6.24022
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Alka v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Lord v. Jurawald3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Asco Westerode3.12011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Cina v. d. Röthaller3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Branca v. d. Biberquelle3.12011
    Laika v. Linduri3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Rosa v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Dax Nelha3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Bella v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Mirco v. Linduri3.12011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s