Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Rika v. Paradies
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Rika v. Paradies
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Anton v. Märchental and Dam Quentje v. Paradies
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.758%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.488%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Quentje v. Paradies50.00011
    Anton v. Märchental50.00011
    Merle v. Paradies25.00011
    Heidehexe v. Veybach25.00011
    Bexter v.d. Reutereiche25.00011
    Avanti v. d. Frankenhöhe25.00011
    Hexe v. Paradies12.50011
    Iska v. Erlengrund12.50011
    Westfalen's Artus12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50022
    Hektor v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Egon v. Buchheim12.50011
    Andra v.d. Reutereiche12.50011
    Ivo v. Buchheim12.50011
    Karlotta-Isa v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz9.370211
    Osca Aus Grupilinga9.370211
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Dele v. Paradies6.25011
    Auguste v. Eulenspiegel6.25011
    Akim v. Rothsee6.25011
    Jana v. d. Riedleite6.25011
    Debby v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Rivkah v. Buchheim6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Westfalen's Chef6.25011
    Isko v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Ira v. Stockey6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.24022
    Arras v. Eschbach6.24022
    Basko v. Tannengarten3.12011
    Kora v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Annett v. Paradies3.12011
    Herman v. Schatzrain3.12011
    Isolde v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Arko v. Deutschen Orden3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Baco v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Asmus v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Foko v. Erlengrund3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Elch v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Bonie v. Keltenquell3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld3.12011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Lilli v. Buchheim3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Gusti v. Stockey3.12011
    Anja v. Veybach3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s