Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Alva v. Hinterhof
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Alva v. Hinterhof
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Gustav v. Forstkamp and Dam Kora v. Frochtmannshof
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 3.125%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Kora v. Frochtmannshof50.00011
    Gustav v. Forstkamp50.00011
    Hunter v. d. Röthaller25.00011
    Biene v. Forstkamp25.00011
    Anton v. d. Klosterwiese25.00011
    Eika v. Frochtmannshof25.00011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Aron v. Averbeck12.50011
    Cina v. d. Röthaller12.50011
    Castor v. Bakumer Esch12.50011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide12.50011
    Assi v. Forstkamp12.50011
    Quino Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.490312
    Juwel v. Perverberg6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Ondra Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte6.25011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Wanda v. d. Binnenelbe6.25011
    Mira v. Linduri6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Dolf v. Mönchsbrunnen6.25011
    Bessi v. Winterberg3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Denver v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Grille v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Elko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Birka v. d. Hirtenburg3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Dixie v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Jako v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Uri v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Alicia v. d. Heustätte3.12011
    Cent v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s