Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Aiko v. d. Otterbäke
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Aiko v. d. Otterbäke
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Pico v. d. Horstbüschen and Dam Bella v. Westerfeld
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.367%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Pico v. d. Horstbüschen50.00011
    Bella v. Westerfeld50.00011
    Dark v. d. Vorheide25.00011
    Neele v.d. Horstbüschen25.00011
    Arco v. Hautzerfeld25.00011
    Hetty v. Waotertimpen25.00011
    Lucky v. Heesenhof12.50011
    Dina v. Ziegelweiher12.50011
    Illo v. d. Trave12.50011
    Anton v. Steinbachtal12.50011
    Asta v. Mellin12.50011
    Cody v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Kim v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Walburga v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Hasko v. Linebrok6.25011
    Westfalen's Cuno6.25011
    Anka v. Rothsee6.25011
    Aikfried v. Murner See6.25011
    Dean v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
    Basko v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
    Cora v. Mittelrhein6.25011
    Isa v. Stockey6.25011
    Flocke v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld6.25011
    Dark v. d. Himmerner Heide6.25011
    Tessa v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Happy v. d. Trave6.25011
    Westfalen's Birka6.25011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck6.24022
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.24022
    Dolly Nelha3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Birko v. Tannengarten3.12011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte3.12011
    Certa v. Hülsebusch3.12011
    Grandl De Wynen3.12011
    Herman v. Schatzrain3.12011
    Elch v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden3.12011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Moni v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Kastor v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Gauner v. Stockey3.12011
    Rena v. Elbufer3.12011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Gusti v. Stockey3.12011
    Greif v. Reitbach3.12011
    Bea v. d.Manningaburg3.12011
    Nimrods Enno3.12011
    Enzo v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Debby v. Emsdeich3.12011
    Cessy v. d. Trave3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s