Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Elch v. Jägerkreuz
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Elch v. Jägerkreuz
    COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hecht v. d. Königseiche and Dam Anja v. Salinenblick
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Anja v. Salinenblick50.00011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche50.00011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche25.00011
    Boss v. Silbersee25.00011
    Hussa v. Rheinufer25.00011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand12.50011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst12.50011
    Natter v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Citta v. Langen Siek12.50011
    Piter v. Feuersang12.50011
    Cäsar v. d. Hohen Geest12.50011
    Anka v. d. Vereinigung12.50011
    Bianka v. d. Königseiche12.50011
    Katja Germania9.36033
    Arno v. Karlshof6.25011
    Arko v. d. Falloh6.25011
    Illa v. Feuersang6.25011
    Imme v. Feuersang6.25011
    Chisko Jenno Graf v. Amelsbüren6.25011
    Alf v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Diva v. d. Uhrau6.25011
    Lord v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Fenna v. Kreyenhorst6.25011
    Anka v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Zent v. Feuersang6.25011
    Donar v. Alten Zollhaus6.25011
    Assi v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Axel v. Teufelsloch6.25011
    Whisky v. Schwege6.25011
    Cora v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Sandra v. Feuersang6.24022
    Baron v. Rehsprung6.24022
    Aero v. Ernst-August-Pold.6.24022
    Djuka v. Wildenloh Harz3.12011
    Este v. Wölpfeld3.12011
    Alvo v. Wulfstein3.12011
    Arno v. Hahnenknoop3.12011
    Hasso v. Mühlenberg3.12011
    Donar v. Turkenweg3.12011
    Edda v. Torfberg3.12011
    Grandt v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Axel v. Eickebusch3.12011
    Freiherr v. Mühlenberg3.12011
    Dia v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Dargo v. d. Schrummer Heide3.12011
    Korda v. Feuersang3.12011
    Freifrau v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Daniel's Dolli3.12011
    Ass v. d. Letzlinger Heide3.12011
    Chef v. Clemenswerth3.12011
    Asso v. Stubben3.12011
    Quinti v. Schwege3.12011
    Bona v. Alten Zollhaus3.12011
    Petra v. Feuersang3.12011
    Bona v. Hohen Geroldseck3.12011
    Isko v. d. Bockswiese3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s