Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Burga v. d. Heustätte
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Burga v. d. Heustätte
    COI 5 gen: 2.344%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Arco v. Backemeer and Dam Alicia v. d. Heustätte
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)56
    Ancestor Loss6
    Ancestor Loss in %90.32 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Arco v. Backemeer50.00011
    Alicia v. d. Heustätte50.00011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten25.00011
    Anke v. Keenmoor25.00011
    Asta v. Butendieks25.00011
    Bautz v. d. Leda25.00011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp18.750211
    Diana v. Linduri12.50011
    Anka v. Birkenhaus12.50011
    Gitta v. Lossetal12.50011
    Dina v. Forstgarten12.50011
    Cent v. Hasselbach12.50011
    Groll v. Huntetal12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee12.50011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg12.490312
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen9.370211
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff6.25011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke6.25011
    Cora v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Ass v. d. Schlei6.25011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh6.25011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Freya v. Steinroden6.25011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.25011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Dolly v. Lossetal6.25011
    Orlo v. d. Overbecker Mühle6.25011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad6.24022
    Ajax v. Klockhof6.24022
    Etzel v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Alard v. d. Leda3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Jenka v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Gina Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Enno v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Anke v. Birkenhof3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Beste v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bob v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Cita v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Britta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Biene v. Ringofen3.12011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Tim v. Feuersang3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s