Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Flocke Saerbeck
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Flocke Saerbeck
    COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Cato Saerbeck and Dam Eika aus Grupilinga
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.293%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Cato Saerbeck50.00011
    Eika aus Grupilinga50.00011
    Esta v. Ruthenstrom25.00011
    Chico v. Borgkamp25.00011
    Hella v. Bärenhorst25.00011
    Quell v. d. Binnenelbe25.00011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff12.50011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund12.50011
    Hanko v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Elvi v. Lossetal12.50011
    Nina v. d. Binnenelbe12.50011
    Alin v. Ruthenstrom12.50011
    Freya v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Bob v. Moorkamp12.50011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand9.370211
    Fango v. Waterkant9.370211
    Anka v. Duewelsknapp6.25011
    Sonja v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Assi v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Groll Holsatia6.25011
    Okko Fortuna6.25011
    Unda v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Alic v. Basbek6.25011
    Birko v. Holsatia6.25011
    Eike v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke6.25011
    Wido v. Schwege6.25011
    Biene v. Ringofen6.25011
    Arrak v. Hagenpolder6.25011
    Dina v. Steinroden6.24022
    Donar v. Alten Zollhaus3.12011
    Hecht v. Schlemminer Forst3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Daisy v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Cilli v. Berghof3.12011
    Baron v. Rehsprung3.12011
    Immo v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Asta v. Werlacke3.12011
    Asso v. Stubben3.12011
    Axel v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Zent v. Feuersang3.12011
    Juno Fortuna3.12011
    Minka v. Hulshof3.12011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Gambo v. Werlacke3.12011
    Diva v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Birko v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Quarz v. Schwege3.12011
    Jutta v. Odisheim3.12011
    Golo Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Manto v. d. Düsterbeck3.12011
    Katja Germania3.12011
    Cita v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Mary v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Quinti v. Schwege3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011
    Nadja v. Lönsstein3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s