Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Cassy v. Hegholz
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Cassy v. Hegholz
    COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Bobby v. d. Hasenheide and Dam Alba v. Immenhof
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Alba v. Immenhof50.00011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide50.00011
    Burgl v. Waldhaus25.00011
    Jago v. Bärenhorst25.00011
    Cliff v. Linduri25.00011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst25.00011
    Astor v. d. Weide18.750211
    Drossel v. d. Grassel12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Certa v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Boss v. Silbersee12.50011
    Quitta Fortuna12.50011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp12.50011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant12.50011
    Unda v. Lönsstein9.370211
    Golo Dankwarder Ode9.370211
    Afra v. Seggehorn9.370211
    Britta v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand6.25011
    Boss Holsatia6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Britta v. Hasselbach6.25011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst6.25011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Osa Fortuna6.25011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Gero v. Wiken6.25011
    Citta v. Langen Siek6.25011
    Gambo v. Werlacke3.12011
    Hecht v. Schlemminer Forst3.12011
    Arno v. Karlshof3.12011
    Juri v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Enno Holsatia3.12011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Juno Fortuna3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011
    Delta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Manto v. d. Düsterbeck3.12011
    Diva v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Fenna v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Immo v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Ajax v. Klockhof3.12011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Pascha v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Anka v. d. Flachsbäke3.12011
    Anka v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dina v. Steinroden3.12011
    Asta v. Werlacke3.12011
    Alf v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Donar v. Alten Zollhaus3.12011
    Birko v. Lönsstein3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s