Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Solojäger's Puck
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Solojäger's Puck
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Dean v. d. Schmiede and Dam Solojäger's Lotte
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Dean v. d. Schmiede50.00011
    Solojäger's Lotte50.00011
    Aury v. Waidbosch25.00011
    Solojäger's Harras25.00011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff25.00011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede25.00011
    Branka v. d. Bärenklause12.50011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg12.50011
    Emo v. Falkenhorst12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Solojäger's Distel12.50011
    Nimrod's Birko12.50011
    Ondra v. Lossetal12.50011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff12.50011
    Edda v. Jurawald6.25011
    Eggi v. Bruckhof6.25011
    Hesto v. Werlacke6.25011
    Bosco v. Rotenberg6.25011
    Hasso v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Cliff v. Linduri6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Cilly v. Falkenhorst6.25011
    Britt Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Eike v. Lossetal6.25011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Fanni v. Osterfeld6.25011
    Irrwisch De Wynen6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Esko v. Huntetal6.25011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen6.25011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Flocke v. d. Tränke6.24022
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.24022
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Harro v. Lossetal3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Lasko v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Timm v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Sent Z Grygovskych3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Anka v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Evi v. Neuenhof3.12011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Quattra De Wynen3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Bobby v. Leefeld3.12011
    Xandra v. Mühlenberg3.12011
    Esko v. Steinroden3.12011
    Niko v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Anja v. Taubertal3.12011
    Esta v. Ruthenstrom3.12011
    Moritz v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Asta v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Asta v. Werlacke3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s