Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Gala v. Hilkefeld
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Gala v. Hilkefeld
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Eddy v. d. Pfauheck and Dam Fenja v. Linebrok
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)67
    Ancestor Loss-5
    Ancestor Loss in %108.06 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck50.00011
    Fenja v. Linebrok50.00011
    Dago v. Heek50.00011
    Tilia Nelha50.00011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg31.250211
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck31.250211
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp31.250211
    Tuja v. Lossetal25.00011
    Asta v. Averbeck25.00011
    Hardy v. Paradies25.00011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp25.00011
    Solojäger's Mélac25.00011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Alo v. Burgstall12.50011
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck12.50011
    Dele v. Paradies12.50011
    Cora v. Linebrok12.50011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50022
    Jola Nelha12.50011
    Halla v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Groll v. Huntetal12.50011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz12.50011
    Isko v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Biene v. Siegbogen12.50011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg12.50011
    Hasso v. Langen Siek6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Gera v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Anja v. Salinenblick6.25011
    Rosa v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Solojäger's Anka6.25011
    Dax Nelha6.25011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Quecke v. Haberland6.25011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Arko v. Abtswald6.25011
    Benno v. d. Haalquelle6.25011
    Josi v. Königsfeld6.25011
    Annett v. Paradies6.25011
    Alice v. Wiebusch6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.24022
    Dux v. Silbersee3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Edda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Hussa v. Rheinufer3.12011
    Cäsar v. Bruckhof3.12011
    Enno v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Bob v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Dunja v. d. Krausen Eiche3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Axel v. Fichtenhain3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Hilda v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Bussa v. Saaletal3.12011
    Orlo v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Yra v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Lord v. Reinufer3.12011
    Mona v. Haberland3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s