Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Kira v. Lönsstein
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Kira v. Lönsstein
    COI 5 gen: 3.125%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Heido v. Lönsstein and Dam Unda v. Bärenhorst
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Unda v. Bärenhorst50.00011
    Heido v. Lönsstein50.00011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp28.120211
    Graf Nelha25.00011
    Gera v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Bautz v. d. Leda25.00011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp15.620211
    Gitta v. Lossetal12.50011
    Solojäger's Granne12.50011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide12.50011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Gero v. Wiken12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee12.50011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe9.370211
    Cita v. Winterberg9.370211
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Dolly v. Lossetal6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.25011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Cliff v. Linduri6.25011
    Enno Holsatia6.25011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Solojäger's Distel6.25011
    Unda v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Becas v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke6.25011
    Delta v. Langen Siek6.25011
    Pascha v. d. Binnenelbe6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Whisky v. Schwege3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Gaston Z Hradistanske Samoty3.12011
    Dina v. Steinroden3.12011
    Britta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Ajax v. Klockhof3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Ute v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Anka v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Edda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Assi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Asta v. Werlacke3.12011
    Morro v. Feuersang3.12011
    Bill v. Bessingslust3.12011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Gambo v. Werlacke3.12011
    Cita v. d. Tränke3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s