Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Aweke v. Eichelberg
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Aweke v. Eichelberg
    COI 5 gen: 2.441%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Boss v. Mellin and Dam Dana v. Seulingswald
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 2.148%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)64
    Ancestor Loss-2
    Ancestor Loss in %103.23 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Kira v. Tillplatz56.250211
    Dana v. Seulingswald50.00011
    Boss v. Mellin50.00011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga50.00011
    Dana v. Tillplatz28.120211
    Arco v. Backemeer28.120211
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher25.00011
    Aika v. Seulingswald25.00011
    Westfalen's Chef25.00011
    Solojäger's Laura25.00011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Ondra v. Stockey25.00011
    Westfalen's Birka12.50011
    Arko v. Fliethbachtal12.50011
    Bella v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Gusti v. Stockey12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee12.50011
    Solojäger's Harras12.50011
    Arras v. Eikenloh12.50011
    Anke v. Keenmoor12.50011
    Ibse v. Linebrok12.50011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff12.50011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Aron v. Averbeck12.50011
    Evita v. Stockey9.370211
    Alex v. Bannwald9.370211
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Cent v. Hasselbach6.25011
    Gauner v. Stockey6.25011
    Lucie Nelha6.25011
    Nimrod's Birko6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Elfe v. Linebrok6.25011
    Boss Holsatia6.25011
    Anka v. Birkenhaus6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Ara v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Dina v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.25011
    Dolly v. Lossetal6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Solojäger's Distel6.25011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Asco Westerode3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s