Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Dana v. Seulingswald
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Dana v. Seulingswald
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Coach v. Ziegelweiher and Dam Aika v. Seulingswald
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Aika v. Seulingswald50.00011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher50.00011
    Ibse v. Linebrok25.00011
    Aron v. Averbeck25.00011
    Westfalen's Birka25.00011
    Arras v. Eikenloh25.00011
    Lucie Nelha12.50011
    Elfe v. Linebrok12.50011
    Lukas v. Linduri12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Gauner v. Stockey12.50011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg12.50011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Evita v. Stockey6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Alex v. Bannwald6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Solojäger's Granne6.25011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Alice v. Wiebusch6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Cora v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Becas v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Branca v. d. Biberquelle3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Filou v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Onko v. Tecklenburg3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Cora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Asco Westerode3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s