Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Nicko v. Heek
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Nicko v. Heek
    COI 5 gen: 2.344%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Vidar v. d. Hafkesdell and Dam Anka v. Heek
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Anka v. Heek50.00011
    Vidar v. d. Hafkesdell50.00011
    Bimbo v. Holmesborn50.00011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Asta v. Holmesborn25.00011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Blitz v. Solmsbachtal25.00011
    Igor v. Linebrok25.00011
    Asta v. Averbeck25.00011
    Elfe v. Linebrok12.50011
    Ahl v. Solmsbachtal12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Vera Würzen12.50011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg12.50011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Illo v. Beilstein12.50011
    Anni v.d. Wetterau12.50011
    Westfalen's Artus12.50011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell9.370211
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide9.370211
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Butcher v. Dinkelstrand6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Alice v. Wiebusch6.25011
    Nikla v. Bergschloss6.25011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Billa v. Heideberg6.25011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Vasko v. Einsiedel6.25011
    Corona v. Zippelförde6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Filou v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Cora v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Dina Chamavia3.12011
    Alf v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Cora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Baco v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Kora v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s