Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Aerle v. d. Tüllheide
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Aerle v. d. Tüllheide
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Askan v. d. Klosterwiese and Dam Debby v. d. Meesenburg
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Askan v. d. Klosterwiese50.00011
    Debby v. d. Meesenburg50.00011
    Arras v. Eschbach25.00011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide25.00011
    Beere v. d. Meesenburg25.00011
    Westfalen's Artus25.00011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Ganna v. Hasenkamp12.50011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Gina v. Roonstein12.50011
    Arras v. Eikenloh12.50011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Hermann v. Stellfelde12.50011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land9.370211
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp6.25011
    Lucie Nelha6.25011
    Finja v. Hasenkamp6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Kora v. Königsfeld6.25011
    Baco v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Effi v. Stellfelde6.25011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Elko v. Huntetal6.25011
    Freya v. Roonstein6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof6.24022
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Dax v. d. Aue3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Arko v. Abtswald3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Dandy v. Roonstein3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Bessy v. Hasenkamp3.12011
    Dunja v. d. Krausen Eiche3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Alo v. Burgstall3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Ronja v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Jenny v. Huckberg3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Dina Chamavia3.12011
    Biene v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Anett v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s