Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Zita v. Stockey
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Zita v. Stockey
    COI 5 gen: 6.348%    low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Solojäger's Unkas and Dam Roberta v. Stockey
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)70
    Ancestor Loss-8
    Ancestor Loss in %112.90 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Westfalen's Don50.00011
    Roberta v. Stockey50.00011
    Solojäger's Unkas50.00011
    Gräfin Hanni v. Hollbäck50.00011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga37.500211
    Naomi v. Stockey25.00011
    Cilly v. Hollbäck25.00011
    Hardy v. Heek25.00011
    Westfalen's Chef25.00011
    Solojäger's Maraun25.00011
    Solojäger's Laura18.750211
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde18.750211
    Evita v. Stockey12.50011
    Asta v. Averbeck12.50011
    Aska v. Forstkamp12.50011
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck12.50011
    Herman v. Schatzrain12.50011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher12.50011
    Jola Nelha12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga9.370211
    Solojäger's Harras9.370211
    Hera v. Wasserplatz9.370211
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff9.370211
    Dina v. Schatzrain6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Asco Westerode6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Aron v. Averbeck6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Rosa v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Westfalen's Birka6.25011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer6.25011
    Dax Nelha6.25011
    Artus v. Elztal6.25011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg6.25011
    Nimrod's Birko6.24022
    Birke Nelha3.12011
    Troll v. Rheinufer3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Dina Chamavia3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Afra v. d. Bohlsener Mühle3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Alf v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Ossy De Wynen3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Bella v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Alka v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Quacks v. Lossetal3.12011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s